Friday, October 11, 2013

 Review of A Study in Scarlet by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle while mentioning A Study in Pink by Stephen Moffat
This story is the one that introduced the public to Doyle’s most infamous characters, Sherlock Holmes and Dr. John Watson.  The story would be familiar to a modern TV viewer if said person were to frequent the BBC series.  BBC’s Sherlock took an interesting approach to a classic.  The outcome to “who done it” was the same, but reached in a very different manner in the show versus the book.  Both of the results are equally brilliant, but the book does a special kind of logic to it that the show changes.  In the recent show, the writers are trying to give Watson a chance to shine.  If he finds out something about a case, it is in looking into the people’s lives while Sherlock would rather think about the logic behind the situation.  The Sherlock in the books is a bit older and more experienced when it comes to thinking of people as part of the whole opposed to something to just be read for anything interesting or even mundane and then thrown about.  The show brings the viewer into Sherlock’s world and makes him into a different breed of eccentric opposed to the books.
Spoiler: the cabbie’s the killer in both stories.  He even has the victim take one pill and he take the other with one being deadly and the other not having an effect.  He is also an older man that has had everything of importance taken from him and is waiting to die from an aneurism.  

It is amazing how these fundamental things can be kept the same and yet, how Sherlock figures it out in the show is far more accessible to a viewer as opposed to the books.  In the book, Sherlock has the answer and just presents the killer to Lestrade and Gregson in a matter of fact manner.  His intellect is far more astounding and indisputable.